Discussion about this post

User's avatar
allyson lu.'s avatar

i actually agree with the desire for art to exist outside the expectation that every creative work must make an explicit political statement, but i find the framing of this somewhat strange. in particular, i think it’s a bit of an odd suggestion to say that one has to “unshackle” oneself from political noise in order to create freely. politics is not necessarily external noise for everyone, and i think that distinction is important. for many people, particularly marginalized artists, identity and lived experience are inherently political, regardless of whether they consciously intend to make a political statement through their work.

i also think there is a potentially troubling implication in distinguishing between “free-thinking” creators and those who are supposedly dogmatic. political consciousness and creative freedom are not mutually exclusive. an artist can be deeply engaged with politics and still produce work that is beautiful, strange, romantic, abstract, escapist, or entirely uninterested in communicating a particular political position.

i understand the broader sentiment—that artists should not feel compelled to justify the ideological meaning of everything they create—but i think describing politics as something from which one must liberate oneself assumes that everyone has the same ability to experience politics as external to their lives.

interesting piece x

No posts

Ready for more?